The davlopmsnt QS sosfMwc engineering

programs is a formiduble undertaking. Undergraduate

software engineering curriculu are currently at an “early

adopter” stage and few schools are wiIling to rkk

developing a whole new prograin (or completely

overhauling an existing program). There are serious

problcms for ihe developmettt of such programs: rhe

software engineering profession is immature there is

confusion about the d@erencc between computer science

and sojhvure engineering: lhere is a luck of understanding

and uppreciatian among computer science fuculty about the

need for sof&ware engineering edircatiion: there is little

available material on curricrtlnrm guidance: and fhevc are

ctrrrentiy no accredited programs in software engineering.-The davlopmsnt QS sosfMwc engineering

programs is a formiduble undertaking. Undergraduate

software engineering curriculu are currently at an “early

adopter” stage and few schools are wiIling to rkk

developing a whole new prograin (or completely

overhauling an existing program). There are serious

problcms for ihe developmettt of such programs: rhe

software engineering profession is immature　there is

confusion about the d@erencc between computer science

and sojhvure engineering: lhere is a luck of understanding

and uppreciatian among computer science fuculty about the

need for sof&ware engineering edircatiion: there is little

available material on curricrtlnrm guidance: and fhevc are

ctrrrentiy no accredited programs in software engineering.