ena对应用程序就像Protege 对我们，我们使用Protege操作

本体，应用程序则是使用Jena来做同样的工作，当然这些应用程序还是得由我

们来编写。其实Protege本身也是在Jena的基础上开发的，你看如果Protege

的console里报异常的话，多半会和Jena有关。最近出了一个Protege OWL

API，相当于对Jena的包装，据说使用起来更方便，这个API就是Protege

的OWL Plugin所使用的，相信作者经过OWL Plugin的开发以后，说这些话

是有一定依据的。 -ena like the Protege application to us, we use the Protege ontology operations, the application is to use Jena to do the same work, of course, these applications still have to be written by us. Protege itself is in fact based on the development of Jena, Protege of the console if you see an exception in the case reported, most of the relevant Council and Jena. Recently out of a Protege OWL API, the packaging equivalent of Jena, is said to be more convenient to use, the Protege' s OWL Plugin API is used, I believe that through the OWL Plugin of the developers, it said these words there is a certain basis.